000			01389nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c520762 _d520762
008			221012b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aKumar, Sanjay and Kumari, Neelam _935167
245			_aJammu and Kashmir after abrogation of article 370
260			_aU.S.I. Journal
300			_a152(628), Apr-Jun, 2022: p.256-267
520			_aThe architects of the Indian Constitution were eager to make the country sovereign, stable, peaceful, and to protect the human rights of people. Constitutional laws contributed a very pivotal role to take the country’s judicial system on right track. The controversial Article 370 provided the Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) state vast powers as an autonomous body which created complex problems including the threat to unity of the country. Therefore, the central government bifurcated the state into two successors ‘Union Territories’, with additional limited aboriginal administrative powers under the central government. Article 370 was a ‘Temporary Provision’ and, thus, the move of the government was essential to abrogate, modify and to eliminate it. This article looks into all the development aspects from different sectors in J&K after abrogation of Article 370. – Reproduced
650			_aJammu and Kashmir, Article 370 _935168
773			_aU.S.I. Journal
906			_aPOLITICS AND GOVERNMENT - JAMMU & KASHMIR
942			_cAR