000			01217pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b2002 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHendriks, Carolyn
245			_aInstitutions of deliberative democratic processes and interest groups: roles, tensions and incentives
260			_c2002
300			_ap.64-75.
362			_aMar
520			_aThere are inherent tensions between traditional, more pluralist forms of public participation and new deliberative democratic processes, such as citizens' juries. These innovative processes, known collectively as citizens ` forums, challenge existing roles and power relationships between interest groups and the state. Instead of having key access to the policy stage, interest groups are required to be `bystanders', `information providers', and ultimately `process legitimisers'. With such a radical shift in roles and power structure, there are few apparent reasons why interest groups would want to participate in such deliberative processes. In some cases, to the detriment of the process, they decide not to. - Reproduced.
650			_aInterest groups
650			_aPolicy making
773			_aAustralian Journal of Public Administration
909			_a52143
999			_c52143 _d52143