000			01626nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c521484 _d521484
008			230209b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFrantz, Christopher K. and Siddiki, Saba _937252
245			_aInstitutional grammar 2.0: A specification for encoding and analyzing institutional design
260			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
300			_a99(2), June, 2021: p.222-247
520			_aPublic affairs scholars have contributed rich insights on the role and outcomes of institutions in policy and administrative settings. They have offered numerous empirical studies of these topics, alongside concepts and theories that can be leveraged in their assessment. But there remains a relative dearth in attention to approaches that can be used to support rigorous assessments of institutional design itself—those that support reliable and nuanced representations of institutional structure and meaning. The Institutional Grammar (IG) is one such approach that has gained in prominence over the last decade. Existing applications validate the IG's utility toward rigorous assessments of institutional design, and highlight the IG's value in operationalizing concepts relevant in policy and administration scholarship. We build on existing IG research by presenting a revised specification IG 2.0 for encoding and analyzing institutional design that responds to representational necessities and analytical opportunities within and beyond policy and administrative domains. – Reproduced
773			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
906			_aPOLICY SIENCES
942			_cAR