000			01694nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c521488 _d521488
008			230209b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aDeters, Henning and Falkner, Gerda _937247
245			_aRemapping the European agenda-setting landscape
260			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
300			_a99(2), June, 2021: p.290-303
520			_aIn the European Union (EU), agenda setting is formally centralized at the European Commission. During the last decade since the Lisbon Treaty, however, this agenda-setting monopoly was challenged by other institutions against the backdrop of the Treaty change, intergovernmental crisis management, politicization, and more informal legislative bargaining. This symposium therefore surveys the emerging agenda-setting powers of the EU's other main institutional actors in their relation to the Commission. The introduction provides a conceptual framework, distinguishing between procedural and discursive agenda-setting power, as well as gatekeeping power and agenda leadership. Based on this typology, we argue that not only the European Council (agenda leadership) but even the Court of Justice of the EU (procedural agenda setting) and the European Parliament (discursive agenda setting) gained more influence on policy decisions through their informal agenda-setting activities. The landscape has thus become variegated, and the Commission, although remaining center stage, now depends more strongly on interinstitutional alliances. – Reproduced
650			_aEuropean Union (EU), European Commission _937248
773			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
906			_aEUROPEAN UNION
942			_cAR