000			01652nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c521510 _d521510
008			230209b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aFay, Daniel L. et al _937256
245			_aIntersectionality and equity: Dynamic bureaucratic representation in higher education
260			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
300			_a99(2), June, 2021: p.335-352
520			_aRepresentative bureaucracy scholarship has yet to address two interrelated phenomena: intersectionality and changes in relative disadvantage over time. This manuscript addresses these gaps by assessing representation effects at the intersection of race/ethnicity and sex and in previously, but no longer, disadvantaged client groups. It also argues that if bureaucratic representation is viewed as a quest for equity, then representation will decline as disadvantaged client groups approach equity in policy outcomes. Using panel data for US higher education, this study highlights the importance of intersectional representation in bureaucratic organizations. In three of the four race/ethnic/sex combinations, students perform better in the presence of faculty who match them intersectionally (in the fourth case, race but not sex matters). The empirical results also find that as a formerly disadvantaged client group (women) becomes successful within an organization, the active representation relationship declines. These implications inform future representative bureaucracy scholarship examining intersectional groups. – Reproduced
773			_aPublic Administration: An International Quarterly
906			_aPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
942			_cAR