| 000 | 01738nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c522018 _d522018 |
||
| 008 | 230307b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aKirpsza, Adam _938282 |
||
| 245 | _aTime is of the essence: Explaining the duration of European union lawmaking under the co-decision procedure | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 300 | _a43(4), Sep, 2022: p.564-579 | ||
| 520 | _aThe article explores factors affecting the duration of the co-decision procedure (currently the ordinary legislative procedure), the main procedure for adopting legislation in the European Union. Drawing from rational choice institutionalism, it expects the speed of co-decision to be determined by three attributes: the impatience of legislators, issue linkage and the characteristics of Council and European Parliament negotiators (relais actors). The hypotheses are tested using survival analysis on a dataset of 599 controversial legislative acts submitted and enacted under co-decision between 1999 and 2009. The results show that co-decision proposals are decided faster when they are urgent, negotiated prior to the European Parliament elections and concluded through single proposal logrolls. By contrast, multi-proposal packages and the ideological distance between relais actors prolong decision-making. Overall, the article contributes to the literature by showing that the impatience of legislators, package deals and the properties of negotiators are relevant drivers of co-decision duration. – Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aEuropean union, EU lawmaking, Legislative duration, ordinary legislative, Co-decision procedure. _936647 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 906 | _aEUROPEAN UNION | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||