000			02004nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c522546 _d522546
008			230421b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSharma, Sanjay _940134
245			_aFinance commissions and disaster risk funding: A paradigm shift in methodology by fifteenth finance commission
260			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
300			_a69(1), Mar, 2023: p. 47-58
520			_aDisaster risk financing has been in practice since the Second Finance Commission in the form of a Margin Money Scheme. Later, it was replaced with a Calamity Relief Fund and a National Calamity Contingency Fund (NCCF)/National Disaster Relief Fund (NDRF). These funds were based on expenditure-based funding, from which a state is provided relief funds based on its past expenditure. There have been a lot of discrepancies as states like Uttarakhand, with high hazard risk vulnerability, received ₹1,158 crore, and Haryana, comparatively a less hazard risk vulnerability state, received ₹1,699 crore for 2015–2020 from the State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF). States and other agencies like National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) have been demanding, for replacing this expenditure-based funding with a state-specific hazard/disaster risk vulnerability for a long time. The Fifteenth Finance Commission addressed this long-standing demand by incorporating an innovative methodology for disaster risk funding. It made a slight departure from the past method and included area, population and disaster risk index for calculating a state’s share in disaster risk funding. This article analytically examines the past and present methodologies of disaster risk funding by applying quantitative and qualitative research methods.- Reproduced
650			_aDisaster risk index, Finance commission, Disaster risk funding, Disaster management, Fifteenth finance commission, India. _937806
773			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
906			_aDISASTER MANAGEMENT
942			_cAR