000			01217nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c522648 _d522648
008			230501b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGaur, Ratika _940346
245			_aPublic order (V sedition) VS freedom of speech and expression - A legal discourse on the limits of Indian rationality in the public sphere
260			_aEconomic and Political Weekly
300			_a 58(11), Mar, 11-18 2023: p.33-39
520			_aPost-independence judicial rulings on the right to freedom of speech and expression have produced two contradictory lines of precedents on the restriction of “public order” under Article 19(2). The first is a “tendency-driven test” which reads public disorder as synonymous with “undermining the security of the state” and therefore sedition, while the second is a “consequence-driven test,” which separates sedition from public disorder, based on the temporal dimensions of proximity and proportionality. The underlying question at stake in either case, however, is that of determining the exercisable limits of an average Indian’s rationality within the public sphere.- Reproduced
773			_aEconomic and Political Weekly
906			_aFFREEDOM OF SPEECH
942			_cAR