000			01586nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c522838 _d522838
008			230607b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aGulati, Jivantika and Ranjan, Radha _941442
245			_aCascading role of governance in ensuring judicial activism in India
260			_aBihar Journal of Public Administration
300			_a19(25), Jul-Sep, 2022: p.146-156
520			_aIt is crucial that all three branches of government work in unison if the country is to advance. But the situation today is worrying. The legislature and the executive either struggle to carry out their responsibilities with the utmost earnestness or try to dodge them. Therefore, the judiciary, the third organ, is the only one left to use judicial activism to address the complaints of the public. There has been activist approach by the judiciary especially for the disadvantaged or downtrodden sections of the society. It has delivered justice to the people keeping in its mind the limitations mentioned in our Indian Constitution. On the other hand, the judges may have crossed the line and forgotten what was acceptable. According to Montesquieu’s “separation of powers” philosophy, there should be no crossing of boundaries. However, the judicial inventiveness that hasn’t been focused on and used by the other machinery is what the public see and view as the judiciary overstepping the other organs. – Reproduced
650			_aJudicial activism, Judiciary and Governance. _938594
773			_aBihar Journal of Public Administration
906			_aJUDICIAL ACTIVISM
942			_cAR