| 000 | 01447nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c523230 _d523230 |
||
| 008 | 230802b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aThelisson, Anne-Sophie _942193 |
||
| 245 | _aCoopetition in a merger process: Regulators and management of cooptative tensions | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 300 | _a89(2), Jun, 2023: p.381-397 | ||
| 520 | _aCoopetitive tensions can arise as strategic decisions are imposed on firms that challenge them to pursue competition and collaboration with other organizations. Regulators—such as the state—can interfere in merger strategies. Using a longitudinal case study, the objective of the study is: (1) to analyze which regulators influence coopetitive tensions in a merger process (including negotiation and integration stages); and (2) to explore how coopetitive tensions are coped with during the process. We found that the state and customers have architectural roles as regulators during the process (negotiation period, deal, and integration process). We explore coopetition paradox management at different levels (interorganizational, organizational, and individual levels) over the merger process.- Reproduced | ||
| 650 |
_aStrategic management, Grand challenges, Local governance, New public management, New public governance. _939548 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aLOCAL GOVERNMENT | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||