| 000 | 01297nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c523236 _d523236 |
||
| 008 | 230802b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aYu, S., Yoo, E.J. and Kim, S. _942197 |
||
| 245 | _aThe effects of performance evaluation on punishment in organisations | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 300 | _a89(2), Jun, 2023: p.484-500 | ||
| 520 | _aThis article expands understanding of the relationship between punishment and performance in organisations. We analyse Korean data on performance and punishment as follows. While prior literature has focused on the effect of punishment on performance, this article examines the effect of performance gaps on punishment. Based on behavioural theory, strategic reference point theory and principal–agent theory, it sheds light on the negative relationship between performance gaps (cause) and punishment (effect). The article demonstrates that low performers are more often punished and high performers less so (i.e. a negativity bias). Our results also show that organisations prioritise light punishment over heavy punishment when disciplining employees in response to performance. – Reproduced | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 906 | _aPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||