| 000 | 01222nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c523489 _d523489 |
||
| 008 | 230905b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aChakravarty, Subhasree _943295 |
||
| 245 | _aColonial modernity and the Bangla literary tradition | ||
| 260 | _aEconomic and Political Weekly | ||
| 300 | _a58(25-26), Jun 24, 2023: p.39-43 | ||
| 520 | _aFor many, the term colonial modernity inspires a spirit of insurgency. From the time of its arrival in the Indian subcontinent by way of imperial powers—following the European Enli¬ghtenment of the 18th century—it has had to face the ire of a fierce group of dissidents. Most of their discomfort lay around the definition of modernity and its ownership. In fact, the definition ¬itself was determined by who could claim the largest stake on modernity and who ended up being at its receiving end. It presented a tricky choice to its audience and practitioners who had the unenviable job of deciding what was acceptably modern and what was not; if you were worse off by not being modern; if mod¬ernity could truly accommodate all our individual perceptions of the modern.- Reproduced | ||
| 773 | _aEconomic and Political Weekly | ||
| 906 | _aLITERATURE | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||