000			01635nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c524388 _d524388
008			231110b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aNewcomer, Kathryn E. et al _945990
245			_aFrom noise to knowledge: Improving evidentiary standards for program efficacy to better inform public policy and management decisions
260			_aPublic Administration Review
300			_a83(5), Sep-Oct, 2023: p.1051-1071
520			_aCurrent approaches employed by U.S.-based clearinghouses to rate the efficacy of interventions to address social problems typically do not result in sufficient information to help practitioners. Current standards of evidence employed across the United States apply a positivist notion of validity with quantitative research criteria that discourage answering important how and why questions, explicitly privilege quantitative/RCT evidence, offer few contextual insights, and rarely discuss disparities in outcomes across participants differing by race, gender, and ethnicity. We offer a set of standards of evidence to assess qualitative and mixed methods studies, as well as RCTs and quasi-experimental designs, and probe the extent to which the studies address context and equity. We applied our proposed new standards of evidence to all intervention studies rated as the highest quality by the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education from 2017 to 2021 to demonstrate the usefulness of our standards. – Reproduced https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13688
773			_aPublic Administration Review
906			_aPUBLIC POLICY
942			_cAR