000			01569nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c524625 _d524625
008			240108b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aCanales, Kristine et al _947527
245			_aRevisiting the micro-foundations of the tiebout theory of local expenditures: Are private community amenities substitutes for local public services in residential choices?
260			_aUrban Affairs Review
300			_a 59(5), Sep, 2023: p.1441-1469
520			_aTiebout's theory of local expenditures predicts the efficient provision of local tax and expenditure bundles via market forces occur when individuals “vote with their feet” (Tiebout 1956). Private amenity choices may distort market signals to local governments. Thus we conduct a conjoint experiment to explore how citizens make choices among hypothetical apartment homes, varying public and club good attributes. This allows us to vary both apartment community and city amenities independently to determine whether private club or public amenities are more influential in shaping residency choices. Regardless of the quality of city services, citizens on average are willing to pay for an additional layer of safety provided by an apartment complex. We conclude that the city's tax expenditure bundle is not the only consideration in residential location choice, suggesting that there is disruption in the efficient provision of public goods. – Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/10780874221103765
773			_aUrban Affairs Review
906			_aURBAN DEVELOPMENT
942			_cAR