000			01619nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c524845 _d524845
008			240124b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aStrader, Eiko et al _948222
245			_aRace in representative bureaucracy theory: A problematizing review
260			_aPublic Administration Review
300			_a83(6), Nov-Dec, 2023: p.1687-1703
520			_aThis study is an epistemic reflexive examination of race in representative bureaucracy theory, responding to the criticism that its conceptualization has been narrow. To counter socially reinforced ways of thinking, we use a problematizing review method to read broadly and selectively. Reviewing a sample of articles published in public administration (immediate research domain); political science (neighboring domain); sociology and Asian/cultural/ethnic studies (indirectly relevant domains) between 2017 and 2021 and paying attention to social constructionism, we examined how race and ethnicity are conceptualized. While the articles in public administration focused on a binary conception of race, treating differential outcomes as natural, articles sampled from other domains explained how ethnoracial categories were constructed, highlighted the contextual nature of differential outcomes, and engaged with the issue of racialization. To expand the conception of race in public administration, we must explore the process in which racial constructs became associated with unequal outcomes. – Reproduced https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/puar.13640
773			_aPublic Administration Review
906			_aBUREAUCRACY
942			_cAR