| 000 | 01400nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c525128 _d525128 |
||
| 008 | 240212b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_a Düzçay, Güney and Öncü, T. Sabri _949893 |
||
| 245 | _aIndia’s inclusion in the JP Morgan GBI-EM indices: A path to Eden or just another sin? | ||
| 260 | _aEconomic and Political Weekly | ||
| 300 | _a58(47). Nov 25, 2023: p.13-18 | ||
| 520 | _aThe concept of “original sin” was introduced by Eichengreen and Hausmann (1999), defining it as “a situation in which the domestic currency cannot be used to borrow abroad or to borrow long term, even domestically.” Subsequently, Eichengreen et al (2003) redefined the concept as a country’s inability to borrow abroad in its own currency, suggesting the term “domestic original sin” for the country’s inability to borrow in its own currency long-term domestically. We adopt the Eichengreen et al (2003) definition of original sin.- Reproduced https://www.epw.in/journal/2023/47/h-t-parekh-finance-column/indias-inclusion-jp-morgan-gbi-em-indices.html | ||
| 650 |
_aOriginal sin Domestic currency Borrowing abroad Eichengreen and Hausmann (1999) Eichengreen et al (2003) Domestic original sin International finance Long-term borrowing Currency risk Economic implications _949894 |
||
| 773 | _aEconomic and Political Weekly | ||
| 906 | _aINTERNATIONAL TRADE | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||