000			01926nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525266 _d525266
008			240220b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMillner, Antony and Heal, Geoffrey _949999
245			_aChoosing the future: Markets, ethics, and rapprochement in social discounting
260			_aJournal of Economic Literature
300			_a61(3), Sep, 2023: p.1037-1087
520			_aThis paper provides a critical review of the literature on choosing social discount rates (SDRs) for public cost-benefit analysis. We discuss two dominant approaches, the first based on market prices and the second based on intertemporal ethics. While both methods have attractive features, neither is immune to criticism. The market-based approach is not entirely persuasive even if markets are perfect, and faces further headwinds once the implications of market imperfections are recognised. By contrast, the 'ethical' approach—which relates SDRs to marginal rates of substitution implicit in a single planner's intertemporal welfare function—does not rely exclusively on markets, but raises difficult questions about what that welfare function should be. There is considerable disagreement on this matter, which translates into enormous variation in the evaluation of long-run payoffs. We discuss the origins of these disagreements, and suggest that they are difficult to resolve unequivocally. This leads us to propose a third approach that recognises the immutable nature of some normative disagreements, and proposes methods for aggregating diverse theories of intertemporal social welfare. We illustrate the application of these methods to social discounting, and suggest that they may help us to move beyond long-standing debates that have bedevilled this field.- Reproduced https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20211675
773			_aJournal of Economic Literature
906			_aSOCIAL DISCOUNTING
942			_cAR