000			01339nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525409 _d525409
008			240301b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aSorenson, Maron W. _950161
245			_aAsking versus telling: The supreme court’s strategic use of questions and statements during oral arguments
260			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
300			_a76(4), Dec, 2023: p.1559-1572
520			_aSupreme Court oral arguments are often characterized as the Court rapidly firing questions at attorneys who struggle to keep up; however, nearly half of the Court’s utterances come not as questions but as statements. I ask whether patterns of questioning and commenting behavior during oral arguments can predict case outcomes and justice votes. To answer this question, I develop a theory of strategic communication that accounts for the differential ways justices—and other strategic actors—use queries and comments during arguments. Using transcripts from 1981 to 2019, I code for use of questions and statements, finding the two theoretically and empirically distinct: where questions increase a party’s chances of winning, statements increase their chance of losing.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231164604
773			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
906			_aJUDICIARY
942			_cAR