000			01647nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525412 _d525412
008			240301b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMiller, Lisa L. _950162
245			_aChecks and balances, veto exceptionalism, and constitutional folk wisdom: Cass and race power in American politics
260			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
300			_a76(4), Dec, 2023: p. 1604-1618
520			_aConventional accounts of the U.S. constitution laud its checks and balances for diffusing power across many venues, limiting the potential for government oppression, and protecting political minorities. I refer to this as constitutional folk wisdom and contrast it with an American political economy approach of veto exceptionalism to better understand how the U.S. constitution shapes, and is shaped, by power relations. This analysis illustrates the volume and scope of veto exceptionalism and its implication for democratic participation and accountability, contrasts it with the virtues championed by the folk wisdom, and suggests how veto exceptionalism can help explain political outcomes and processes in American politics. I argue that the folk wisdom is not only inaccurate as a description of how power functions in the American “checks and balances” system; it is cultivated and utilized most frequently by powerful economic and racial actors that benefit from the anti-democratic and elitist features of the U.S. constitutional system.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231166040
773			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
906			_aPOLITICS AND GOVERNMENT – UNITED STATES
942			_cAR