000			01718nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525573 _d525573
008			240322b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aStokan, E., Hatch, M.E. and Overton, M. _950775
245			_aFifty years as the fourth pillar of public administration: A polycentric extension of the social equity framework
260			_aPublic Administration: An international quarterly
300			_a101(4), Dec, 2023: p. 1427-1442
520			_aWhile public consideration of social equity pre-dates Minnowbrook (Blessett et al., 2019; Burnier, 2021), the field formally recognized social equity as its fourth pillar after the conference (Frederickson, 1971). The National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA, 2000), Svara and Brunet (2004, 2005), and Johnson and Svara (2011) outlined a unified social equity framework along four dimensions: procedural fairness, access, quality, and outcomes. We build on this important work by offering a polycentric extension, which considers what social equity means when government programs are often place-based and delivered in an intergovernmental context with multiple decision-making units across spatial levels (e.g., state, city, neighborhood) simultaneously. Using the Community Development Block Grant as an example, we demonstrate the importance of careful consideration of geographic levels in the delivery of public goods for understanding the program's social equity implications. The polycentric framework can be a useful tool for evaluating the social equity of policies. – Reproduced https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12888
773			_aPublic Administration: An international quarterly
906			_aPUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
942			_cAR