000			01683nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525574 _d525574
008			240322b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aBoonstra, Beitske et al _951972
245			_aKeep going on: A qualitative comparative analysis on the durability of solidarity initiatives during and after crisis
260			_aPublic Administration: An international quarterly
300			_a101(4), Dec, 2023: p. 1443-1460
520			_aDuring the COVID-19 lockdowns in the Netherlands, numerous solidarity initiatives emerged, providing relief to those affected by lockdown measures. These initiatives have an important added value for a society under crisis as they provide instant solutions to timely, crisis-related needs, strengthen connectivity between stakeholders and divide the burdens of the crisis. The durability of these initiatives is however a concern and although the literature on durability of community-based initiatives is growing, there is a lack of understanding how initiatives can sustain under the challenging dynamics of a major crisis. Using a fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 14 COVID-19 solidarity initiatives in Rotterdam, this article explores whether conditions for the durability of community-based initiatives in general (social capital, organizational resources, transformational leadership, and government support) also apply during a crisis, with special attention of the configurations of conditions under the challenging context of the COVID-19 pandemic. – Reproduced https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/padm.12897
773			_aPublic Administration: An international quarterly
906			_aPANDEMIC
942			_cAR