000			01588nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c525880 _d525880
008			240422b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aHayton, Bill _951818
245			_aStrategic forgetting: Britain, China, and the South China Sea, 1894–1938
260			_aModern Asian Studies
300			_a57(3). May, 2023: p.966-985
520			_aThis article clarifies a mythologized episode in the early development of the South China Sea disputes and shows how it was later ‘forgotten’ by British policymakers for strategic reasons. Using documents from the UK National Archives it confirms, for the first time, that Qing/Chinese officials did deny responsibility for the Paracel Islands in 1898/1899. It then shows how this correspondence was strategically ignored by British officials during the 1930s in the context of renewed disputes between China, France, and Japan over the sovereignty of the islands. It argues that during the 1930s, British officials sought to bolster the Chinese position in the South China Sea because of a concern that France would remain neutral in any forthcoming conflict. This resulted in Britain taking a view on the sovereignty disputes that was at odds with the evidence in its own archives but which provided useful political support for the Republic of China. – Reproduced https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/modern-asian-studies/article/abs/strategic-forgetting-britain-china-and-the-south-china-sea-18941938/BBC1EF4C133C350D1AABF62206D9A5CC
773			_aModern Asian Studies
906			_aINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
942			_cAR