| 000 | 01588nam a22001577a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c525996 _d525996 |
||
| 008 | 240430b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aReisenbichler, Alexander _951942 |
||
| 245 | _aEntrenchment or retrenchment: The political economy of mortgage debt subsidies in the united states and Germany | ||
| 260 | _aComparative Politics | ||
| 300 | _a55(4), Jul, 2022: p.717-740 | ||
| 520 | _aWhy do mortgage subsidies vary across countries? Until the 2000s, the U.S. and Germany provided large-scale subsidies for homeownership. Yet, their paths diverged when they faced deep economic crises at that time. While the U.S. doubled down on government support by quasi-nationalizing its mortgage market, Germany retrenched homeowner subsidies. This article argues that growth regimes shape coalitional logics that explain these contrasting outcomes. In the U.S. demand-led regime, where housing is key to growth, a bipartisan coalition entrenched mortgage subsidies to stimulate household credit and consumption. Germany's export-led regime, where housing is less central to growth, produced a broad-based coalition that retrenched homeowner subsidies to boost competitiveness. Detailed case studies contrast the quasi-nationalization of U.S. government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) with the retrenchment of the German "homeowner subsidy" (Eigenheimzulage).- Reproduced https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2022/00000054/00000004/art00007 | ||
| 650 |
_aMortagage debt, Political economy, _951943 |
||
| 773 | _aComparative Politics | ||
| 906 | _aMORTGAGE | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||