000			01956nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c526423 _d526423
008			240603b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAlderdice, John Lord _953313
245			_aNew insights into the psychology of individuals and large groups in a world of changing conflicts
260			_aInternational Political Science Review
300			_a45(1), Jan, 2024: p.94-105
520			_aThe character of armed conflict has changed dramatically. The use of overwhelming force no longer brings victory and success. Under what conditions do supposedly weaker conflict actors ‘outpower’ stronger actors? This article argues that, throughout human history, those most willing to engage in and sustain extreme conflict have not been rational actors but ‘devoted actors’ driven by faith in defending or advancing their non-negotiable ‘sacred values’, whether religious or secular. Bringing into dialogue insights from large group psychology, neuroscience, and epigenetics with political science, this article demonstrates how two factors can help explain apparently non-rational elements of human functioning during armed conflict: first, the biological substrate helps elucidate why and how rational actor models seem to underestimate the influence of ‘right and wrong’ in people’s behaviour; second, the complex psychology of large groups often drives people to engage in action that may not be in their own individual interests.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01925121231177444
650			_aArmed conflict, Overwhelming force, Victory and success, Weaker vs. stronger actors, Devoted actors, Sacred values, Large group psychology, Neuroscience, Epigenetics, Political science, Biological substrate, Rational vs. non-rational behavior, Right and wrong, Individual vs. collective interests. _953314
773			_aInternational Political Science Review
906			_aCONFLICT MANAGEMENT
942			_cAR