| 000 | 01659nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c526424 _d526424 |
||
| 008 | 240603b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aFerraro, Vicente _953319 |
||
| 245 | _aWhy Russia invaded Ukraine and how wars benefit autocrats: The domestic sources of the Russo-Ukrainian war | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 300 | _a45(2), Mar, 2024: p.170-191 | ||
| 520 | _aContrary to Vladimir Putin’s geopolitical arguments, there was little chance that a full-scale invasion of Ukraine would benefit Russia’s position in the European balance of power and enhance its overall security. Instead, I argue that Putin’s decision was based on domestic interests, mainly the regime’s legitimation, a major pillar of authoritarian stability. Using a multi-method research design, I demonstrate that the war has significant potential to boost Putin’s popularity, nationalism and authoritarian preferences in society, as well as to strengthen his image as the country’s heroic protector. As in several autocracies, the instrumentalization of security concerns and existential threats are a powerful source of regime cohesion. These arguments are corroborated by data from Russia’s current and previous conflicts, such as elites’ discourse, analysis of repressive policies, and public opinion polls on Putin’s rule and authoritarian preferences. The regime needs a hostile ‘West’ and a threatening Ukraine for self-legitimation.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01925121231215048 | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Political Science Review | ||
| 906 | _aINTERNATIONAL RELATIONS | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||