000			02309nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c526795 _d526795
008			240626b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aPetrov, Philip _955179
245			_aPolitical development and political thought
260			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
300			_a77(1), Mar, 2024: p.76-88
520			_aThis essay applies existing research in new institutional economics to early modern European political theory so as to offer an interpretive proposal. Using Hobbes, Hume, and James Madison as examples, the essay proposes that understanding early modern European political theorists as inhabitants of developing countries (in a particular sense of that term) can benefit contemporary readers in interpreting some of these theorists’ normative prescriptions. Early modern political theorists faced significant risk of large-scale violence, political instability, and state repression in polities that still struggled to accomplish goals such as implementing rule of law, protecting property rights, and widely distributing material resources using impartial criteria. By contrast, many contemporary readers of these writers live in the developed and liberal-democratic West. Contemporary readers are thus liable to normalize their own conditions and to underestimate the political-economic constraints under which early modern political theorists wrote, thereby misreading some of the latter’s normative prescriptions. By interpreting early modern political theorists as writers who faced institutional constraints that have significantly receded in today’s West, contemporary readers can enrich their understanding of these writers’ objectives.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231193425
650			_aEarly modern political theory, Political economy, New institutional economics, Developing countries, Rule of law, Property rights, Resource distribution, Political instability, State repression, Hobbes, Hume, James Madison, Normative prescriptions, Historical context, Liberal democracy, Institutional constraints, Comparative interpretation, Political violence, Economic development, Western political thought, Interpretive frameworks _955180
773			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
906			_aPOLITICAL THEORIES
942			_cAR