000			02248nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c526849 _d526849
008			240627b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aShybalkina, Iuliia _955317
245			_aGetting a grant is just the first step: Administrative capacity and successful grant implementation
260			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
300			_a54(3), Apr, 2024: p.287-302
520			_aThis study examines the link between the pace of utilizing the awarded intergovernmental grants and the administrative capacity of recipient government organizations. Past research focused on the relationship between higher administrative capacity and obtaining grants. However, there is a lack of attention to how capacity affects grant funds utilization, which is critical for achieving societal impact. To address this issue, the study analyzes the Coronavirus Relief Fund (CRF) established by the CARES Act to aid state and local governments with COVID-19-related expenses. The study justifies and performs multiple regression analyses using data from various sources, including the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Census Annual Survey of Public Employment and Payroll, and the Government Finance Officers Association. The study discovered that financial administrative capacity was positively linked to the proportion of funds spent early in the CRF program rollout, a finding that withstood scrutiny when employing various measures of administrative capacity. However, the connection between capacity and spending tapered off toward the end of the program rollout, potentially due to workload stabilization, increased program clarity from the federal government, capacity-building by recipients, and the use of external experts. The findings of this study carry significant implications for both research and practice, underlining the necessity of studying the implementation stage of government grant programs and investing in building administrative capacity within recipient organizations.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02750740231206823
650			_aIntergovernmental grants, COVID 19, _955318
773			_aAmerican Review of Public Administration
906			_aPUBLIC SECTORS
942			_cAR