000			02087nam a22001337a 4500
999			_c526949 _d526949
008			240725b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRice, C.Connaughton, B. Ratcliffe, J. and Somerville, I. _946644
245			_aA slow-burning crisis: Executive relations and the normalisation of distrust in northern Ireland’s ‘cash for ash’ fiasco
260			_aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
300			_a90(2), Jun, 2024: p.437-453
520			_aThis paper explores relationships between ministers, special advisers and civil servants through the lens of a high-profile government crisis in Northern Ireland (NI). Although political–administrative relationships are a mainstay of public administration research, we still have limited understanding of how these relationships feature and function within the ‘Westminster family’ of governance when operating within devolved institutions or post-conflict societies, nor of their role in crisis. We use Scott’s institutional pillars as an analytical framework and conduct a documentary analysis of public inquiry witness statements to explore the Renewable Heat Incentive crisis which led to the collapse of the NI legislature. Utilising a novel application of existing theory, we demonstrate that the implementation of the devolved, consociational power-sharing model incubated new governance norms, that prioritised and legitimised the agendas and actions of political actors (ministers and special advisers), over civil servants. Specifically, in understanding how relational norms – particularly distrust – feed public policy failure and institutional crisis, our findings contribute to this research area and to the broader public administration field. Government institutional crisis negatively impacts upon public service delivery and the wider health of democracy. Understanding such crises is an important first step in their amelioration.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00208523231189882
773			_aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
942			_cAR