000			02775nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c527007 _d527007
008			240729b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aWeller, Nicholas and Jamieson, Thomas _955818
245			_aCorrecting myopia: Effect of information provision on support for preparedness policy
260			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
300			_a77(2), Jun, 2024: p.485-499
520			_aSome scholars argue that the public is generally myopic in their attitudes about disaster preparedness spending, because they prefer to spend money on disaster response rather than preparedness, despite the greater cost effectiveness of the later. Given voters’ general lack of policy information, it is possible that limited support for preparedness comes from lack of information about its efficacy. In this paper, we build on these studies by examining how people respond to new information about the effectiveness of policy initiatives in the context of public health and the COVID-19 pandemic. Through two online survey experiments with over 3400 respondents, we demonstrate that information can lead people to update attitudes about preparedness, illustrating the potential for information campaigns to increase support for preparedness policies. Our results suggest that information about the efficacy of preparedness can increase support for these policies, and the information effect exists even for individuals whose prior beliefs were that public health programs were ineffective. These results suggest that information can make people more supportive of preparedness spending, which could provide electoral incentives for its provision. We conclude by providing some directions for future research to enhance our understanding of public opinion and preparedness spending.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10659129231221486
650			_aDisaster preparedness—Public opinion, Emergency management—Preparedness vs response, Public health policy—COVID-19, Information campaigns—Policy support, Voter behavior—Policy awareness, Survey experiments—Preparedness attitudes, Risk communication—Public health, Cost-effectiveness—Preparedness spending, Behavioral economics—Disaster policy, Health emergencies—Public response, Policy efficacy—Public perception, COVID-19 pandemic—Preparedness lessons, Public education—Emergency planning, Electoral incentives—Preparedness funding, Bayesian analysis—Public opinion, Attitude change—Information exposure, Crisis management—Public support, Preventive policy—Public health, Government spending—Preparedness vs response, Political psychology—Disaster preparedness _955819
773			_aPolitical Research Quarterly
906			_aDISASTER MANAGEMENT
942			_cAR