| 000 | 01216nam a22001337a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c527788 _d527788 |
||
| 008 | 240924b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aIde, Enrique and Montero, Juan-Pablo _947791 |
||
| 245 | _aMonopolization with must-haves | ||
| 260 | _aAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics | ||
| 300 | _a16(3), Aug, 2024: p.284-320 | ||
| 520 | _aAn increasing number of monopolization cases have been constructed around the notion of "must-have" items: products that distributors must carry to "compete effectively." Motivated by these cases, we consider a multiproduct setting where upstream suppliers sell their products through competing distributors offering one-stop-shopping convenience to consumers. We show the emergence of products that distributors cannot afford not to carry if their rivals do. A supplier of such products can exploit this must-have property, along with tying and exclusivity provisions, to monopolize adjacent, otherwise-competitive markets. Policy interventions that ban tying or exclusivity provisions may prove ineffective or even backfire.- Reproduced https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/mic.20230018 | ||
| 773 | _aAmerican Economic Journal: Microeconomics | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||