000			01535nam a22001577a 4500
999			_c528407 _d528407
008			241204b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aMurtazashvili, Ilia and Murtazashvili, Jennifer Brickv _949281
245			_aMurtazashvili, Ilia and Murtazashvili, Jennifer Brickv
260			_aComparative Politics
300			_a56(3), Jul, 2024: p.541-560
520			_aResearch in comparative politics on informal institutions can be grouped into analysis of norms and values within government institutions and studies of self-governance in communities that are relatively isolated from states. Three recent books by Nadya Hajj, Shelby Grossman, and David Skarbek advance this research agenda by showing that self-governance can be significant even in contexts where the state is present, including refugee camps, markets in urban settings, and in prisons. They also offer abundant insights into how to overcome challenges with measuring and analyzing informal institutions. Rather than prioritize private or public governance, the authors see these as imperfect alternatives that invite analysis of why private governance works better in some contexts than in others for communities seeking to improve their lives in challenging circumstances.- Reproduced https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/cuny/cp/2024/00000056/00000004/art00007
650			_aAnarchy, Informal Institutions, Private governance, Public governance, Self-governance. _949282
773			_aComparative Politics
906			_aBOOK REVIEW
942			_cAR