000			01244nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c528450 _d528450
008			241205b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aBhattacharya, Debjani Ghosh Ghosh, Piyali and Chakraborty, Rachana _949346
245			_aShades of grey: An ethical dilemma
260			_aVikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers
300			_a49(3), Jul-Sep, 2024: p.257-264
520			_aThis case refers to an ethical dilemma encountered by the Internal Committee (IC) of a manufacturing corporation in redressing a complaint of sexual harassment raised by an employee against another colleague. The stream of incidents brought to light during the proceedings of the IC brings out the challenges faced by any decision-making authority in figuring out whether an employee alleged with the misconduct of sexual harassment could be guilty in reality. The case thus throws open the question of whether an allegation of sexual harassment is always black-and-white or whether there is any tinge of grey in it.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/02560909241265051
650			_anal Committee, PHOSH act, Sexual harassment, Misconduct, Enquiry. _949347
773			_aVikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers
942			_cAR