| 000 | 02144nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c528858 _d528858 |
||
| 008 | 250127b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aOngaro, Edoardo _950398 |
||
| 245 | _aIntegrating the neo-weberian state and public value | ||
| 260 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 300 | _a90(4), Dec, 2024: p.830-844 | ||
| 520 | _aTwo thematic areas have grown in significance in the contemporary scientific literature of public governance, public administration and public management over the past 20 to 30 years: the theory and practice of public value, and theorisation of the neo-Weberian state (NWS). In this paper, we argue that, while these two important thematic areas have so far developed in a mostly unconnected way from each other, they both might benefit from integrating each other's perspective into their theoretical frame, and we outline the contours of such a framework. We argue that the NWS and public value might theoretically be combined in three forms of integration of the respective perspectives: the integration of the NWS conceived of as model with an approach to public value conceived of as an addition of value through the actions by public managers; the NWS as an ideal type with public value conceived of as an addition of value through the actions by public managers; and the NWS as an ideal type with public value conceived of as a contribution to the public sphere. The NWS may benefit from integrating the public value perspective in order to develop some of its core components: how it compounds input legitimacy with output legitimacy, and how it integrates the managerial components into a narrative of managerial action for the public purpose. The perspective of public value may benefit from engaging into a dialogue with NWS, if it aspires to be a truly global paradigm for managing public services.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00208523241228830 | ||
| 650 |
_aPublic value, Neo-weberian state, Public sector reform, Administrative theory, Public management. _950399 |
||
| 773 | _aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||