| 000 | 01717nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c529004 _d529004 |
||
| 008 | 250211b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aRoy, Nabarun _950614 |
||
| 245 | _aContested grounds and missing sticks: Assessing the legality of India’s surgical strikes in Pakistan | ||
| 260 | _aIndian Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs | ||
| 300 | _a80(4), Dec, 2024: p.481-502 | ||
| 520 | _aThe article wades into the contested issue of the legality of India’s surgical strikes in Pakistan in the last decade. While legal scholars have deliberated on the legality of India’s actions, international relations (IR) have remained silent, thereby underlining the chasm between IR and international law when it comes to international issues. This article evaluates the competing claims made by legal scholars by engaging with developments in international law pertaining to the use of force as an ‘outsider’ approaching the issue from a fresh vantage point. It finds the argument regarding the weakness of India’s legal position to be more convincing. However,it does not fully subscribe to the reasons attributed for the weakness. Drawing on insights from IR, it highlights the salience of political considerations and incentive structures. The article argues that a comprehensive view that includes legal and political dimensions needs to be taken to appreciate India’s stand regarding the surgical strikes.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09749284241285070 | ||
| 650 |
_aUse of force, Surgical strikes, India, Pakistan, International law, Pre-emptive strike, Power. _950615 |
||
| 773 | _aIndian Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||