| 000 | 01195nam a22001337a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c530229 _d530229 |
||
| 008 | 250530b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aChakraborty, Pinaki Nagpal, Resham and Das, Piyali _953976 |
||
| 245 | _a Operationalisation of fiscal rules: A state-level analysis | ||
| 260 | _aEconomic & Political Weekly | ||
| 300 | _a60(18), May 3, 2025: p.76-83 | ||
| 520 | _aAfter the enactment of fiscal responsibility legislations at the state level, successive finance commissions have provided incentives to states in the form of grants or additional borrowing power to encourage compliance with fiscal rules. An analysis of the debt profile of major states is conducted, and the operationalisation of state-level fiscal rules is examined. The findings indicate that grants-based incentives have been more effective than expanding fiscal space through increased borrowing capacity. Furthermore, states, in aggregate, have adhered to the debt and deficit targets specified in the fiscal rules for most years. – Reproduced https://www.epw.in/journal/2025/18/sixteenth-finance-commission/operationalisation-fiscal-rules.html | ||
| 773 | _aEconomic & Political Weekly | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||