| 000 | 01472nam a22001457a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 999 |
_c530653 _d530653 |
||
| 008 | 250630b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 |
_aKanika and Saroha, Sonal _954869 |
||
| 245 | _aMonetary compensation in tort law: issues of adequacy and justice | ||
| 260 | _aBihar Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 300 | _a21(2s), Jul-Dec, 2024: p.536-548 | ||
| 520 | _aTort law is fundamentally aimed at compensating victims for losses they suffer due to the wrongful actions of others. Historically, monetary compensation has served as the primary mechanism for compensating harm, be it personal injury, property damage, or economic loss. However, the adequacy of monetary compensation in achieving justice is increasingly being questioned. This also sermon reconnoitres the issues surrounding the adequacy of monetary awards in tort law and examines whether they serve justice beyond mere economic restitution. By snooping into principles of fairness, human suffering, and socioeconomic inequalities, this article posits that the current framework for monetary compensation in tort cases is insuffi cient and calls for a rethinking of how justice can be achieved for victims. - Reproduced http://www.iipabiharbranch.org/upload/BJPA%20Vol.%20XXI%20No%202(S).pdf | ||
| 650 |
_aadequacy, restorative justice, fairness and equity, corrective justice, monetary compensation, tort law _954870 |
||
| 773 | _0Bihar Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 942 | _cAR | ||