000			01239nam a22001457a 4500
999			_c531834 _d531834
008			251022b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLiotzis, Vangelis _957524
245			_aThe ‘reverse sexism’ thesis: A re-appraisal
260			_aJournal of Human Values
300			_a31(3), Sep, 2025: p.278-290
520			_aThis article attempts to identify, in the context of the contemporary debate on discrimination, the meanings attributed to the term ‘reverse sexism’, which concerns the broader social phenomenon of sexism. It examines how the rhetoric of reverse sexism has been shaped historically, highlights aspects of the criticism that it has received, and describes the field in which it is currently being reproduced. Upon this basis, it is proposed that ‘reverse sexism’ should be rejected as an inadequate conceptualization for describing discrimination against men. At the same time, it is suggested that it could be replaced by the concept of ‘sexist offsetting’.- Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09716858251322319
650			_aMen’s rights movement, Reverse sexism, Second sexism, Sexism, Sexist offsetting. _957525
773			_aJournal of Human Values
942			_cAR