000			01625nam a22001337a 4500
999			_c532838 _d532838
008			260323b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRoss, Nicholas and Bramble, Alexander _959828
245			_aSins of omission or acts of commission? Explaining the impacts of commissions on lasting peace
260			_aInternational Political Science Review
300			_a46(5), Nov, 2025: p.705-719
520			_aDrawing on the dataset that surfaced the original definition of ‘inclusive commissions,’ the authors present a framework for classifying peace commissions, and argue that substantial variation in the design of commissions and how they articulate with other institutions in a peace or political process may help to account for the lack of consensus across thematic literatures. On the other hand, the focus of existing commissions studies on a few functions or mandates, and the conception of ‘inclusion’ in these studies, may miss significant parts of commissions’ contribution. We discuss the limitations of conventional models of inclusion, and suggest an alternative that emphasizes the infrastructural contribution made by commissions. Lastly, we describe the important dimensions of how commissions interact with other institutions, and how these correspond to strategies of resistance by conflict imbricated elites.-Reproduced https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/01925121251334062?_gl=1*1q15f3f*_up*MQ..*_ga*NjQ2MzU5MjM0LjE3NzQyNDc4MTk.*_ga_60R758KFDG*czE3NzQyNDc4MTkkbzEkZzEkdDE3NzQyNDc4NDckajMyJGwwJGg0NDc1Njc1MzA.
773			_aInternational Political Science Review
942			_cAR