000			01856nam a22001337a 4500
999			_c532890 _d532890
008			260330b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aKamlakar, Tanay Pramod and Pretana, Sanjay _959893
245			_aAlgorithmic bias in forensics AI and the legal standards for admissibility in India
260			_aJournal of the Indian Law Institute
300			_a67(1), Jan-Mar, 2025: p.18-48
520			_aThe integration of Artificial Intelligence (hereinafter, “AI”) in forensic practices particularly facial recognition, predictive policing, and gait analysis has begun to reshape the Indian criminal justice landscape. While these tools offer operational efficiency, they also pose significant risks of algorithmic bias and evidentiary unreliability. This paper critically evaluates the admissibility of AI–generated forensic evidence under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. It examines how caste, gender, religion, and socio-economic bias may become structurally encoded within algorithms, thereby violating constitutional protections under articles 14, 20(3), and 21. Drawing on jurisprudential developments from the United States, United Kingdom and European Union, the paper analyses global benchmarks on reliability, transparency and due process in AI– enabled evidence. It concludes by proposing detailed statutory and procedural reforms to ensure algorithmic accountability, evidentiary integrity, and judicial scrutiny, thereby aligning India’s evidentiary framework with constitutional mandates and international best practices.-Reproduced http://14.139.60.116:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/48451/1/04_Algorithmic%20Bias%20in%20Forensic%20AI%20and%20the%20Legal%20Standards%20for%20Admissibility%20in%20India.pdf
773			_aJournal of the Indian Law Institute
942			_cAR