000			01170nam a22001337a 4500
999			_c533182 _d533182
008			260428b ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aPrasoon, Satya and Singh, Shilpi _960299
245			_aSupriyo v union of INDIA (2023): Interpretive failures and limits of anti-discrimination guarantee in INDIA
260			_aEconomic & Political Weekly
300			_a 61(12), Mar 21, 2026: p.14-17
520			_aThe Court’s judgment in Supriyo v Union of India (2023), especially after the ruling in Navtej Johar v Union of India (2018), fails to uphold the baseline of a decent society with dignity for queers. By mis-framing the issue, misapplying precedents and deferring to majoritarian heteronormative morality, the Court reinforced institutional humiliation. The Court’s stand on protecting homosexual identity but only as long as it is not openly performed reduces homosexuals to a suspect category, compelling them to take on practices of covering their identity, limiting their experience as full citizens. –Reproduced https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/12/commentary/supriyo-v-union-india-2023.html
773			_aEconomic & Political Weekly
942			_cAR