| 000 | 01184pab a2200169 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2002 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aLowndes, Vivien | ||
| 245 | _aBetween rhetoric and reality: does the 2001 white paper reverse the centralising trend in Britain | ||
| 260 | _c2002 | ||
| 300 | _ap.135-47. | ||
| 362 | _aAutumn | ||
| 520 | _aThis article assesses the government's claim that the White Paper, Strong Local Leadership - Quality Public Services (2001), reverses the centralising trend of the previous 20 years. It is argued that the `confessions and concessions' of the White Paper do not actually represent a reduction of centralism or any enhancement of local government autonomy. where controls are relaxed, these are primarily managerial rather than political; delivery rather than democracy is the primary focus of attention. Increasingly sophisticated approaches to performance management signal both a new form of centralism and a challenge to the traditional bilateral model of central-local relations. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aLocal government - Great Britain | ||
| 650 | _aLocal government | ||
| 773 | _aLocal Government Studies | ||
| 909 | _a54681 | ||
| 999 |
_c54681 _d54681 |
||