000			01259pab a2200181 454500
008			180718b2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aAufrecht, Steven E.
245			_aIndians 78, Washington state O: stories about Indians and the law
260			_c2005
300			_ap.450-61.
362			_aJul-Aug
520			_aIn the 1970s Washington State lost a series of legal cases related to Native Americans. These cases exemplify the need for knowledge of federal Indian law - but such knowledge, out of context, is insufficient. Key aspects of federal Indian law are hard to accept because of conflicting stories that Americans already believe. The authors discuss the importance of stories and review commonly believed stories that block acceptance of federal Indian law. They then discuss basic principles of Indian law and distill four questions to help determine tribal jurisdiction. The authors review the Marshal Tgrilogy - three Supreme Court cases that set the foundations of modern Native American law - and show how the legal principles play out in an analysis of three contemporary court cases. - Reproduced.
650			_aLaw - India
650			_aLaw
700			_aCase, David S.
773			_aPublic Administration Review
909			_a66751
999			_c66751 _d66751