| 000 | 01254pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aLudden, David | ||
| 245 | _aDevelopment regimes in South Asia: history and the governance conundrum | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 300 | _ap.4042-051. | ||
| 362 | _a10 Sep | ||
| 520 | _aA new imperial formation is emerging and globalisation today has much in common with globalisation a century ago. Then there was British Empire, now there is US Empire. In global development discourse, each national state governs its economy, and each `developing economy' is developing itself, in a global context, but in south Asia and elsewhere, national development regimes can also be understood realistically as officially but not operationally independent territories in a global development regime. Who is leading development, who is benefiting, and where today's trends are moving remain debatable. It is more accurate to say that development has entered a confusing phase of flux and uncertainty. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aGlobalization - South Asia | ||
| 650 | _aEconomic and social development - South Asia | ||
| 650 | _aEconomic and social development | ||
| 773 | _aEconomic and Political Weekly | ||
| 909 | _a66954 | ||
| 999 |
_c66954 _d66954 |
||