000			01562pab a2200193 454500
008			180718b2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aRamabrahmam, I.
245			_aImplementation deficit in social sector: Mismatch between goals and outcomes
260			_c2005
300			_ap.516-530.
362			_aJul-Sep
520			_aConstitution makers visualised that certain ideals particularly in the economic domain should not be given up by the state. The union, state and local governments have a moral obligation to follow. The directive principles in the Constitution of India stand as a testimony to the framers' articulation. These broadly can be stated as those which stand for the welfare of the people. It includes education, health and nutrition. Post-reform period offers a challenge to the students of public policy as to how nation-states which accepted the structural adjustment programmes effected changes in their welfare domains. It was argued by champions of the liberalisation that withdrawal of state from the other economic sectors, in fact, allows the nation states, a greater elbow room for the social sector. This assumption needs to be analysed against the backdrop of not only dwindling budgetary support to welfare across the states in India, but also from the perspectives of how allocated resources are efficiently used. -Reproduced.
650			_aEconomic and social development
650			_aSocial sector
700			_aBabu, J. Ravindra
773			_aIndian Journal of Public Administration
908			_aN
909			_a67399
999			_c67399 _d67399