| 000 | 01067pab a2200157 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2005 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aShields, Patricia M. | ||
| 245 | _aClassical pragmatism does not need an upgrade: lessons for public administration | ||
| 260 | _c2005 | ||
| 300 | _ap.504-18. | ||
| 362 | _aSep | ||
| 520 | _aIn 2003, administration & society published Patricia Shields's "The Community of Inquiry: Classical Pragmatism and public administration." Shortly thereafter, Huge Miller responded with "Old Pragmatism Needs and Upgrade" in the Disputatio Sine Fine section of Administration & Society. He argued that scholars like Shields, Evans, and Snider should incorporate the ideas of Richard Rorty into their scholarship, Miller's article was followed by a series 9 essays debating the merits of Dewey and Rorty for public administration. This article summarizes the debate and argues that Classical Pragmatism does not need an upgrade. -Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aPublic administration | ||
| 773 | _aAdministration and Society | ||
| 909 | _a67741 | ||
| 999 |
_c67741 _d67741 |
||