000			01442pab a2200169 454500
008			180718b2007 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100			_aLens, Vicki
245			_aAdministrative justice in public welfare bureaucracies: when citizens (don't) complain
260			_c2007
300			_ap.382-418.
362			_aMay
520			_aOne of the few avenues open to citizens to dispute mistakes in the administration of public welfare programs is administrative hearings ("fair hearings"). However, recipients rarely use them. This has important implications for social equity, as government is obligated to ensure its process for distributing benefits is fair and equitable. Drawing on data from 28 qualitative interviews with recipients who were sanctioned for violating the work rules, this study explores why recipients appealed, or did not appeal, their work sanctions. The findings indicate that nearly all of the recipients believed they were wrongfully sanctioned and were aware of their right to appeal. For recipients who did not appeal, the fair hearing system was indistinguishable from the rest of the agency, which they viewed as inflexible and intractable. In contrast, those who appealed viewed fair hearings more favorably, and unlike the nonappealers, had been encouraged to appeal by social networks. - Reproduced.
650			_aPublic administration
773			_aAdministration and Society
908			_aN
909			_a74033
999			_c74033 _d74033