| 000 | 01221pab a2200193 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2007 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aBruni, Luigino | ||
| 245 | _aThe road not taken: how psychology was removed from economics, and how it might be brought back | ||
| 260 | _c2007 | ||
| 300 | _ap.146-73. | ||
| 362 | _aJan | ||
| 520 | _aThis article explores parallels between the debate prompted by Pareto's reformulation of choice theory at the beginning of the twentieth century and current controversies about the status of behavioural economics. Before Pareto's reformulation, neoclassical economics was based on theoretical and experimental psychology, as behavioural economics now is. Current `discovered preference' defences of rational-choice theory echo arguments made by Pareto. Both treat economics as a separate science of rational choice, independent of psychology. Both confront two fundamental problems: to find a defensible definition of the domain of economics, and to justify the assumption that preferences are consistent and stable. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aPsychology | ||
| 650 | _aEconomics | ||
| 700 | _aSugden, Robert | ||
| 773 | _aEconomic Journal | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a74508 | ||
| 999 |
_c74508 _d74508 |
||