| 000 | 01125pab a2200181 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2008 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aKonrad, Kai A. | ||
| 245 | _aTime consistency and bureaucratic budget competition | ||
| 260 | _c2008 | ||
| 300 | _ap.1-15. | ||
| 362 | _aJan | ||
| 520 | _aHigh employment protection in the public sector results in strategic over-employment if government divisions compete for budgets in a dynamic setting. Bureaucrats who are interested in maximising their divisions output employ excess labour, since this induces the sponsor to provide complementary inputs in the future. Restrictions on hiring decisions in the public sector can be regarded as provisions to reduce strategic hiring. We also provide evidence from a survey of decision makers in a public sector bureaucracy with very high employment protection. The results confirm that decision makers are aware of the strategic effects of their hiring decisions on budget allocation. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aCivil service | ||
| 700 | _aKessing, Sebastian G. | ||
| 773 | _aEconomic Journal | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a77868 | ||
| 999 |
_c77868 _d77868 |
||