| 000 | 01616pab a2200193 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2009 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aMastracci, Sharon H. | ||
| 245 | _aWho are the contingent workers in federal government? | ||
| 260 | _c2009 | ||
| 300 | _ap.352-73. | ||
| 362 | _aJul | ||
| 520 | _aTo most federal employment means stable work with good pay, good benefits, long-run job security, and opportunities for promotion from the mail room to upper management. The authors' debunk that notion. The authors' definitively establish the presence of a core/ring structure in federal employment. core occupations are permanent full-time, year-round stable positions, whereas ring jobs are comparatively unstable work situations: temporary, part-time, and/or for a specified period of time. Federal personnel administrators increasingly use temporary, contract, on-call, and part-time positions to control costs. Even when we control for individual characteristics - educational attainment and years of experience - we find group characteristics - particularly gender - reduce the chances of working in a permanent federal job. Is this an indictment against the federal government's reputation as a model employer? Perhaps. At the very least, the potential for gender disparity in employment outcomes deserves further study. Contingent arrangements at the agency level deserve a closer look too. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aHuman resources development | ||
| 650 | _aCivil service | ||
| 700 | _aThompson, James R. | ||
| 773 | _aAmerican Review of Public Administration | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a83131 | ||
| 999 |
_c83131 _d83131 |
||