| 000 | 01289pab a2200169 454500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | 180718b2010 xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
| 100 | _aHakins, Christopher | ||
| 245 | _aInter-jurisdictional economic development: A political institution explanation for policy choice | ||
| 260 | _c2010 | ||
| 300 | _ap.379-389. | ||
| 362 | _aJun | ||
| 520 | _aThis study examines the role of formal institutions and rules of government in the formation of joint venture agreements for economic development. Research suggests local governing arrangements play an influential role in the policy area of local economic development. This study resents an argument that form of government provides incentives that influence the decision to establish a developmental, redistributive, or regional interjurisdictional agreement. The results of a multinominal logit model using survey data collected from 12 metropolitan areas provides evidence to support the hypotheses that unreformed governing institutions, compared to cities with an appointed professional manager, are more likely to form joint venture agreements that are developmental in nature. - Reproduced. | ||
| 650 | _aEconomic and social development | ||
| 773 | _aInternational Journal of Public Administration | ||
| 908 | _aN | ||
| 909 | _a87246 | ||
| 999 |
_c87246 _d87246 |
||